I’m pretty sure we read and analyzed “The Second Coming” in
class last year. I can admit though that
compared with now, I didn’t have a clue what the poem meant. Today I can say that I am beginning to
understand it.
The poem speaks of Yeats’ disappointment in society and its
recent worldwide failings between 1910 and 1920. In it, he uses his idea of a gyre to express the
next coming of a new “god” or ruler. It
seems to him that this new ruler will not be a happy one.
This poem really made me admire Yeats once I understood it
more. At first, after reading about
Yeats’ automatic writing with his wife, I thought he was a little nuts. I mean seriously, writing subconsciously? In
his poems though, it is obvious that all his elements come together.
Do
I agree with Yeats idea of gyres? Of course I don’t. I don’t believe that every two thousand years
a divine impregnation begins the process of a new ruler or leader being
born. The idea is just a little too
crazy for me. What isn’t crazy about the
idea though, is a poet dealing with real-world and current issues. To me, that is what qualifies an author,
poet, artist, or anyone as great. Anyone
can talk about horses and meadows, but slipping real world issues into their
work is what’s impressive, especially when they’re not saying
No comments:
Post a Comment